It’s essentially impossible to meet this particular controversy with a reasonable discussion given the ignorant hatred at the center of it. We really don’t want to spend too much time on this one in an attempt limit how much we amplify those voices, but basically, there are some who think that The Last of Us Part 2 focuses too much on Ellie and Dina’s relationship, a character named Lev who struggles with his gender identity at great risk to himself and his family, and the game’s racially diverse cast of characters. There is a sadly vocal group of gamers who are criticizing The Last of Us Part 2 over its diverse group of characters and emphasis on LGBTQ characters and storylines. While we can’t quite account for everything about The Last of Us Part 2 that fans object to, we thought it would be a good idea to break down some of the biggest The Last of Us Part 2 controversies in case you were wondering why it has quickly become one of the most debated games in recent history. Said controversies have even resulted in thousands of gamers review bombing the game on Metacritic and other review platforms in an attempt to drastically drive down the sequel’s overall user score. There are currently several notable controversies that surround nearly all discussions involving the game. At this point, when you hear that The Last of Us Part 2 is a divisive title, you’re actually not hearing about just one controversy. Still, the reactions that appeared in the days that followed The Last of Us Part 2‘s initial leaks and eventual release have been somewhat surprising. After all, it’s the sequel to a game that was not only widely beloved but infamous for an ambiguous finale which some felt didn’t need to be resolved in a follow-up. In a way, it was inevitable that The Last of Us Part 2 would be controversial. If say someones face was used as a logo and trademarked and then another company used something very very similar to sell the same type of product then yes their could be legal action.Īlso wasn’t there a case in the US where EA (i think might have been someone else) argued that it was freedom of speech to use a likeness even if it had the same name for the NFL or NBA game.This THE LAST OF US PART 2 article contains spoilers. Should the real people be able to sue to game publishers? leading on from that should game publishers therefore be allowed to sue people who happen to look like game characters that are protected under trademark/copyright?Īlso a persons likeness isnt protected. Also there is bound to be atleast one person in the world who looks like every human video game character ever made maybe even a few who look like non human ones. Why would there be legal action over this? All they have to say is that it is a completely different character ei ellen vs ellie who happens to look and sound similar, however given that Last of us is a fictional story they could not possibly be one and the same.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |